Home > Uncategorized > Waist on a torus

Waist on a torus

Last year I worked on a interesting problem of the possibility of partitioning a convex set in a plane in to {n} internally disjoint convex pieces of equal area and perimeter. The problem has since been proved when {n} is a prime power, by Aronov and Hubard and Roman Karasev for all dimensions. Here in this post I discuss a crucial lemma i worked while attempting to prove the n is a “power of two” case. In the simplest case, the lemma goes like this: given a continuous function {f:(S^{1})^{2} \rightarrow \mathrm{I\!R}} which has the {y}-antipodal property: {f(x,-y) = -f(x,y)}, there is a pair of separators of a torus along its “waist” that map to zero under {f}. More specifically, there is a subset {\Lambda} of the zero set of {f} which is such that the projection map {p_1(x,y) = x} restricted to {\Lambda} is not null homotopic. For larger powers of {2}, the notation gets a little unwieldy but the proof scales up well. Lets tackle notation first:

Label the coordinates of {(S^1)^{2^n}} in a binary system, with words using the letters {0}, {1} and {2}. The words that can be formed using these letters can be treated as vertices in a binary tree, with the word {0} as the root node. The root node has a unique child vertex as the word {1}. Other vertices consist of words {w} in letters {\{1,2\}} ( of length {<n}) each having child nodes {w1} and {w2}. For example, the binary tree for {n=3} would have vertices as below:

If we impose the dictionary ordering on such words, {0 < 1 < 2 < 11 < 12 < 21 < 22 < 111 < 222 \ldots, 12\ldots2}, then each word of length {l \le n} uniquely identifies a coordinate in {(S^1)^{2^n}}. For example, a point {x} in {S^{8}} can be written as {(x_0,x_1,x_{11},x_{12},x_{111},x_{112},x_{121},x_{122})}.

Let {W} be the set of words representing indices to coordinates of points in {(S^1)^{2^n}} that have letters in 0,1 and 2, with 0 appearing only as the starting letter and are of length not more than {n}. For each word {w \in W} of length {k\le n} we define {p_{w}:(S^1)^{2^n} \rightarrow S} to be the projection map: {p_{w}(x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_{w},\ldots) = x_{w}}. Given {w\in W}, we define a map {\omega_{w}: (S^1)^{2^n} \rightarrow (S^1)^{2^n}} as follows:

\displaystyle p_{w1w'}(\omega_{w}(x)) = x_{w2w'}, \text{ for all words} \quad w1w' \in W

\displaystyle p_{w2w'}(\omega_{w}(x)) = x_{w1w'}, \text{ for all words} \quad w2w' \in W

\displaystyle p_w(\omega_w(x)) = -x_w

and for every other word {v \in W}, {p_v( \omega_w(x)) = x_v}.

For instance, for {x \in S^{8}} and {w = 1}, we have,

\displaystyle  \omega_{1}(x) = \omega_{1}(x_0,x_1,x_{11},x_{12},x_{111},x_{112},x_{121},x_{122}) = (x_0,-x_1,x_{12},x_{11},x_{121},x_{122},x_{111},x_{112})

Thus, {\omega_{w}} changes the sign of the coordinate with index {w} and swaps coordinates with indexes {w1v} with {w2v}, leaving all the other coordinates fixed. If {w_k} represents a subword of {w} consisting of first {k} letters from {w}, then using the definition of {\omega_k}, we note in particular, that {p_{w_k}( \omega_w(x)) = x_{w_k}}. Finally let {\text{len}: W \rightarrow \mathrm{I\!N}} to be the map that gives the length of a word {w} in {W}.

Definition 1 ({w}-antipodal map) For {w \in W}, we say that a map {P:(S^1)^{2^n} \rightarrow \mathrm{I\!R}^{2^n-1}} is {w}-antipodal, if,

\displaystyle {\tilde p_w}(P(\omega_{w}(x))) = -{\tilde p_w}(P(x))

.

Theorem 2 Let {{f}: (S^1)^{2^n} \rightarrow \mathrm{I\!R}^{2^n-1}} be a continuous map with the {w}-antipodal property for each word {w \in W}. Suppose there exists {\mathbf{c} \in (S^1)^{2^n}} such that {f(\mathbf{c}) = \mathbf{0}}. Then the zero set of {f} contains a connected subset {\Lambda} which can be approximated arbitrarily closely in the Hausdorff distance by a smooth loop {L}, for which the projection map: {p_0 : L \rightarrow S^1}, {p_0(y_0,y_1,\ldots) = y_0} is not null-homotopic.

The second lemma is a Borsuk Ulam type theorem which has a cleaner and simpler proof:

Lemma 2 Let {P} be a real valued function defined on the connected closed subset {\Lambda} on the torus {(S^1)^{k}} such that projection {p_1:S^1 \times (S^1)^{k-1} \rightarrow S^1} defined by {p_1(x,\mathbf{y}) = x} is not null-homotopic. Then there exists two points {(x,\mathbf{y_1})} and {(-x,\mathbf{y_2})} in {\Lambda} such that {P(x,\mathbf{y_1}) = P(-x,\mathbf{y_2})}.

Lets tackle this in a more natural setting shall we? which is a pdf document rather than html. Here it is.

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.