Waist on a torus
Last year I worked on a interesting problem of the possibility of partitioning a convex set in a plane in to internally disjoint convex pieces of equal area and perimeter. The problem has since been proved when
is a prime power, by Aronov and Hubard and Roman Karasev for all dimensions. Here in this post I discuss a crucial lemma i worked while attempting to prove the n is a “power of two” case. In the simplest case, the lemma goes like this: given a continuous function
which has the
-antipodal property:
, there is a pair of separators of a torus along its “waist” that map to zero under
. More specifically, there is a subset
of the zero set of
which is such that the projection map
restricted to
is not null homotopic. For larger powers of
, the notation gets a little unwieldy but the proof scales up well. Lets tackle notation first:
Label the coordinates of in a binary system, with words using the letters
,
and
. The words that can be formed using these letters can be treated as vertices in a binary tree, with the word
as the root node. The root node has a unique child vertex as the word
. Other vertices consist of words
in letters
( of length
) each having child nodes
and
. For example, the binary tree for
would have vertices as below:
If we impose the dictionary ordering on such words, , then each word of length
uniquely identifies a coordinate in
. For example, a point
in
can be written as
.
Let be the set of words representing indices to coordinates of points in
that have letters in 0,1 and 2, with 0 appearing only as the starting letter and are of length not more than
. For each word
of length
we define
to be the projection map:
. Given
, we define a map
as follows:
and for every other word ,
.
For instance, for and
, we have,
Thus, changes the sign of the coordinate with index
and swaps coordinates with indexes
with
, leaving all the other coordinates fixed. If
represents a subword of
consisting of first
letters from
, then using the definition of
, we note in particular, that
. Finally let
to be the map that gives the length of a word
in
.
Definition 1 (
-antipodal map) For
, we say that a map
is
-antipodal, if,
.
Theorem 2 Let
be a continuous map with the
-antipodal property for each word
. Suppose there exists
such that
. Then the zero set of
contains a connected subset
which can be approximated arbitrarily closely in the Hausdorff distance by a smooth loop
, for which the projection map:
,
is not null-homotopic.
The second lemma is a Borsuk Ulam type theorem which has a cleaner and simpler proof:
Lemma 2 Let
be a real valued function defined on the connected closed subset
on the torus
such that projection
defined by
is not null-homotopic. Then there exists two points
and
in
such that
.
Lets tackle this in a more natural setting shall we? which is a pdf document rather than html. Here it is.

