Archive

Posts Tagged ‘cyclotomic polynomials’

a result concerning cyclotomic polynomials

April 24, 2011 1 comment

In this post we record a useful result concerning cyclotomic polynomials. This will help us prove what is claimed in this post.

Theorem: For distinct positive integers {i,j} the GCD of the values of cyclotomic polynomials {\Phi_i(y)} and {\Phi_j(y)} , is {p} only if {j = i \cdot p^k} for some integer {k \ge 1}. On the other hand, if {j = i \cdot p^k} for some {k \ge 1}, {(\Phi_i(y) , \Phi_j(y)) = p \text{ or } 1}.

Proof: ({\Leftarrow}) We show that {j = i \cdot p^k} for some {k \ge 1} if {p | (\Phi_j(y), \Phi_i(y))}. We will start by proving that the gcd {g=(i,j)=i}. Then show that j/i is a prime power. Let {g = (i,j)} and assume to the contrary that {g < i}. The cyclotomic polynomials {\Phi_i(y)} and {\Phi_j(y)} divide {\frac{(y^j-1)}{(y^g-1)}} and {\frac{(y^i-1)}{(y^g-1)}} resp. But, {\frac{(y^i-1)}{(y^g-1)}} and {\frac{(y^j-1)}{(y^g-1)}} are relatively prime (easy exercise), and so their divisors {\Phi_i(y)} and {\Phi_j(y)} are also relatively prime. This shows that if for {1 \le i < j}, the values of cyclotomic polynomials {\Phi_i(y)} and {\Phi_j(y)} have a factor in common then {\text{gcd}(i,j) = i}.

Now suppose {j= m \cdot i} and that, a prime {p}, divides the values of cyclotomic polynomials {\Phi_i(y)} and {\Phi_j(y)}. But {\Phi_j(y)} divides

\displaystyle \frac{ (y^j-1)}{(y^i-1)}=1+y^i+ \ldots + y^{i(m-1)},

and so {p} also divides it. Going modulo {p}, we see that {(y^j-1)/(y^i-1) \mod p=m}. This proves that {m} is a multiple of {p}. Next we show that {m} is a power of {p}.

Let {p^h} be the largest power of {p} dividing {i} and {p^k} be the largest power of {p} that divides {j = i\cdot m}. Now using Thm 1.1 of \cite{YVES}, we have,

\displaystyle  \Phi_{i}(y) | \Phi_{i/p^h}(y^{p^h}) \text{ and } \Phi_{im} (y) | \Phi_{im/p^k} (y^{p^k})

Now, {\Phi_{i/p^h}(y^{p^h}) \mod p = \Phi_{i/p^h} (y)} and {\Phi_{im/p^k} (y^{p^k}) \mod p = \Phi_{im/p^k} (y)}. Since {p | \Phi_i(y)} and {p | \Phi_j(y)}, {p} divides both { \Phi_{im/p^k}(y)} and { \Phi_{i/p^h}(y)}. From the arguments in the first paragraph of this proof, this is possible only if {im/p^k = i/p^h} or {m = p^{k-h}}. Hence {j = i p^{k-h}}.

({\Rightarrow}) Let {j = i \cdot p^k} ({k>0}). From the proof in the “only if” direction {p} is the only prime that can possibly divide { (\Phi_i(y), \Phi_j(y))}. To show that

\displaystyle {(\Phi_i(y),\Phi_j(y) = p \text{ or } 1}

it will be enough to show that

\displaystyle {p | (\Phi_i(y) , \Phi_j(y)) }  \Rightarrow {p^2 {\not |} \Phi_j(y)}

First suppose {p^k \neq 2}. Since {p | \Phi_i(y)}, we must have, {p | (y^i-1)} and so we may write {y^i \mod p^2= 1 + ap \mod p^2}, for some {a \in \{0,\ldots, p-1\}}. Also, as {\Phi_j(y) | (y^{i p^k} -1 ) / (y^i-1)}, it is enough to show that {p^2 {\not |} (y^{i p^k} -1 ) / (y^i-1)} to show that {p^2 {\not |} \Phi_j(y)}. Consider,

\displaystyle  (y^{i p^k} -1 ) / (y^i-1) \mod p^2 = 1 + y^i + \ldots + y^{(p^k-1)i} \mod p^2

\displaystyle  = p + ap + 2 ap + 3 ap + \ldots + (p^k-1) ap \mod p^2

\displaystyle  = p + ap ( p^k ( p^k-1)/2 ) \mod p^2 = p \mod p^2

Thus {p^2 {\not |} (y^{i p^k} - 1) / (y^i-1)}. If {j = 2i} with {p=2}, and {i} is an even number then {\Phi_j(y) | (y^{2i}-1) / (y^i-1) = 1 + y^i \mod 4 \neq 0}. If {i} is odd then,

\displaystyle \Phi_{2i} (y) = \Phi_i(-y) | (y^{i} + 1)/(y+1) = 1 - y + y^2 - \ldots + y^{i-1}

. The last value modulo {4} is an odd number and so is not a multiple of {4}. Hence in any case {p^2 {\not |} (y^{j}-1)/(y^i-1)}

This shows that {p^2 {\not |}\Phi_j(y)} and that {(\Phi_j(y),\Phi_i(y) ) = p \text{ or } 1}.

{9} \bibitem{YVES} Y. Gallot, Cyclotomic polynomials and Prime Numbers, \url{http://perso.orange.fr/yves.gallot/papers/cyclotomic.pdf}

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.