associativity of amalgams or why universal properties can be powerful
Amalgams of groups are examples of what are known as colimits in category theory(aka abstract non-sense). With abstract non-sense, you can turn a blind-eye to the structure of the groups and concentrate wholly on its social behavior, determined by its universal property. There is nothing deep about proving results using universal properties of groups, as we are using the most obvious properties of groups when interacting with other groups. But these can be super-powerful when it comes to proving stuff which would otherwise be non-trivial ( for example when you are only looking at the structure of these groups).
Recall that the product of groups where
, amalgamated with groups
using injective homomorphisms
and
for
is the group
along with homomorphisms
that are compatible with
and
. This means that
for all
. Further,
has the universal property that if
is any group with homomorphisms
which are compatible with the maps
for each
, we have a unique homomorphism
such that:
The group is usually denoted by
. To illustrate the power of this definition, lets us prove the following assertion about associativity of amalgams.
Note that the amalgam is exactly the group that makes the following diagram commute and

whats more important: it is best candidate for making the diagram commute in the sense that, if is any other group replacing
that also makes the above diagram commute then there is a unique homomorphism from
to
. Such a
is hence unique upto a unique isomorphism. To prove the above equality we try to show that LHS also has the universal property of the amalgam RHS and hence there must be a unique isomorphism between the two. Consider the diagram below:
With the amalgam we have homomorphisms
and
and the with amalgam
we have homomorphisms
.
Now if is any group with maps
for
, that are compatible with
, then we need to show that
factors via a unique homomorphism
.
.
The map and
are compatible with
and
so by universal property of the amalgam
we have a unique morphism
such that
. Now since
are compatible with
and
, the map
can be further factored using the universal property of the amalgam
by the unique homomorphism
. This shows the associativity of amalgamation.
Note 1: When amalgams were first introduced, before category theory came into being, (see for example ww-2 era papers by B.H Neumann on free groups with amalgamation et. al), they were treated as generalized versions of free products of groups with complicated inner structures. They never made use of these elegant universal properties and proving such things as associativity, can get really messy.
Updated:Fixed typo
